Security readout for executives and security teams
CVE-2006-2492 is a Microsoft Word buffer overflow where a malicious Word document could run attacker-controlled code after a user opens it. It affected legacy Office and Works Suite versions. Because CISA lists it in KEV and the record cites zero-day use, any remaining vulnerable installations should be treated as urgent legacy risk. Exposure is most likely on systems that can still open documents with Office 2000 SP3, Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP1/SP2, or Microsoft Works Suites through 2006. Modern environments may still be exposed through old workstations, archived images, isolated business systems, or unmanaged endpoints. Prioritize this where legacy Microsoft Office remains in production or can process inbound documents. The vulnerability is old, but KEV status means it has been exploited and should not remain unresolved on any business-critical or internet-connected workflow. Mitigation focus: Apply Microsoft MS06-027 security updates where applicable.; Retire or replace unsupported Office and Works Suite installations.; Inventory endpoints for vulnerable Word, Office, and Works versions..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2006-2492 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- Yes
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CISA KEV status
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- MS06-027CVE reference · vendor-advisory, x_refsource_MS
- oval:org.mitre.oval:def:2068CVE reference · vdb-entry, signature
- oval:org.mitre.oval:def:1738CVE reference · vdb-entry, signature
- word-code-execution(26556)CVE reference · vdb-entry, x_refsource_XF
- oval:org.mitre.oval:def:1418CVE reference · vdb-entry, signature
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2006-2492CVE reference · government-resource
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
