LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2006-0121: Multiple memory leaks in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 allow attackers to cause a denial o...

Multiple memory leaks in IBM Lotus Notes and Domino Server before 6.5.5 allow attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and crash) via unknown vectors related to (1) unspecified vectors during the SSL handshake (SPR# MKIN67MQVW), (2) the stash file during the SSL handshake (SPR# MKIN693QUT), and possibly other vectors. NOTE: due to insufficient information in the original vendor advisory, it is not clear whether there is an attacker role in other memory leaks that are specified in the advisory.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This is an old IBM Lotus Notes and Domino issue where certain SSL handshake handling could leak memory until the application or server crashes. The main business risk is service interruption for organizations still running versions before 6.5.5. The public record does not confirm data theft, code execution, or active exploitation. Exposure is most likely in legacy environments still running IBM Lotus Notes or Domino Server before 6.5.5, especially where SSL-enabled components are reachable by users or networks. Modern environments are unlikely to be affected unless old Notes/Domino systems remain in production or internal infrastructure. Prioritize remediation if legacy Notes or Domino systems still support business workflows. The issue is availability-focused, not proven data compromise, but a crash of collaboration or messaging infrastructure can still disrupt operations. If no affected legacy systems remain, record the finding as not applicable. Mitigation focus: Upgrade affected IBM Lotus Notes or Domino Server deployments to 6.5.5 or later.; Review IBM advisory and Lotus SPR fix references for environment-specific guidance.; Restrict network access to legacy SSL-enabled Notes or Domino services where possible..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2006-0121 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.