LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2005-2675: Note: the vendor has disputed this issue.

Note: the vendor has disputed this issue. Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Land Down Under (LDU) 800 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) s or (2) m parameter to forums.php, (3) o, (4) w, (5) s, or (6) p parameter to list.php, (7) m parameter to journal.php, (8) x or (9) n parameter to forums.php, or (10) w parameter to links.php. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by the vendor, who says "None of the tricks written there are working, the variables are properly sanitized and no LDU version is affected.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2005-2675 is an old, disputed report alleging SQL injection in Land Down Under (LDU) 800. The vendor reportedly denied that the described techniques worked and said variables were properly sanitized. Business urgency depends on whether any legacy LDU deployment still exists; the public record does not prove active exploitation or a confirmed fix. Likely exposure is limited to organizations still running legacy Land Down Under software, especially public forum or content features. The source bundle does not confirm affected versions beyond the disputed LDU 800 claim. Do not treat this as an emergency without confirmed LDU exposure. Assign asset-verification priority for legacy web systems, then escalate only if a reachable LDU installation is found. Mitigation focus: Inventory any Land Down Under or LDU deployments, especially public web instances.; Check vendor or project archives for authoritative guidance before applying third-party claims.; Restrict public access to confirmed legacy LDU instances pending vendor-backed guidance..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2005-2675 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.