LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2005-2069: pam_ldap and nss_ldap, when used with OpenLDAP and connecting to a slave using TLS, does not use TLS for th...

pam_ldap and nss_ldap, when used with OpenLDAP and connecting to a slave using TLS, does not use TLS for the subsequent connection if the client is referred to a master, which may cause a password to be sent in cleartext and allows remote attackers to sniff the password.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This issue can expose user passwords when older LDAP authentication clients connect securely to an OpenLDAP replica, then follow a referral to the master without keeping TLS protection. The result is possible cleartext password disclosure on the network. The risk is concentrated in legacy LDAP master/slave environments using pam_ldap or nss_ldap. Likely exposure is limited to legacy Unix/Linux systems using pam_ldap or nss_ldap with OpenLDAP replication, referrals, and StartTLS/TLS. Systems using different LDAP clients, no referrals, or fully updated vendor packages may not be exposed. Exact affected versions are not identified in the provided bundle. Treat this as a targeted legacy-infrastructure risk. Prioritize review where LDAP still backs operating-system login or privileged administration. If the environment no longer uses pam_ldap, nss_ldap, or OpenLDAP referrals, document non-applicability and keep normal patch hygiene. Mitigation focus: Apply relevant vendor security updates for pam_ldap, nss_ldap, or distribution LDAP packages.; Review Gentoo, Red Hat, Ubuntu, Mandriva, and other vendor advisories for affected package guidance.; Ensure LDAP referral connections to masters are protected with TLS according to vendor documentation..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2005-2069 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.