LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2005-10004: Cacti graph_view.php RCE via graph_start Parameter Injection

Cacti versions prior to 0.8.6-d contain a remote command execution vulnerability in the graph_view.php script. An authenticated user can inject arbitrary shell commands via the graph_start GET parameter, which is improperly handled during graph rendering. This flaw allows attackers to execute commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the web server process, potentially compromising system integrity.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a command execution flaw in old Cacti installations. A logged-in user could abuse the graph rendering page to run operating-system commands as the web server account. Successful exploitation could lead to server compromise, but the bundle does not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation if any legacy Cacti instance remains in production. The business risk is server compromise by an authenticated user, amplified by public exploit availability. If Cacti is not deployed or is modern and access-controlled, urgency is lower.

Technical view

CVE-2005-10004 is a CWE-78 issue in Cacti graph_view.php before 0.8.6-d. The graph_start GET parameter is improperly handled during graph rendering, allowing authenticated remote command execution with web server privileges. CVSS 4.0 is 8.7, with low attack complexity and low privileges required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in legacy Cacti deployments older than 0.8.6-d, especially where authenticated access is broadly available. Internet exposure increases business risk, but the issue requires an authenticated user according to the supplied description.

Exploitation context

Public exploit references exist in Metasploit and Exploit-DB, which increases practical risk. The CVE is not marked KEV in the bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Treat exploit availability as real, but do not assume current exploitation without telemetry.

Researcher notes

The supplied affected metadata is sparse and partially unhelpful, but the narrative, CVSS vector, and third-party advisory identify pre-0.8.6-d Cacti as affected. Do not claim unauthenticated exploitation or active exploitation from this bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Cacti instances and confirm exact installed versions.
  • Upgrade any Cacti version earlier than 0.8.6-d or follow current vendor guidance.
  • Restrict Cacti access to trusted administrators and management networks.
  • Review Cacti accounts and remove unnecessary authenticated users.
  • Check vendor downloads and advisories for supported upgrade paths.

Validation and detection

  • Verify whether graph_view.php exists on deployed Cacti systems.
  • Confirm installed Cacti versions against the affected pre-0.8.6-d range.
  • Review web logs for unusual graph_start parameter activity.
  • Check Cacti authentication logs for unexpected user activity.
  • Validate that Cacti is not exposed beyond intended management users.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2005-10004 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2005-10004Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Raxnet/Ian BerryCacti0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.