LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2004-1111: Cisco IOS 2.2(18)EW, 12.2(18)EWA, 12.2(14)SZ, 12.2(18)S, 12.2(18)SE, 12.2(18)SV, 12.2(18)SW, and other vers...

Cisco IOS 2.2(18)EW, 12.2(18)EWA, 12.2(14)SZ, 12.2(18)S, 12.2(18)SE, 12.2(18)SV, 12.2(18)SW, and other versions without the "no service dhcp" command, keep undeliverable DHCP packets in the queue instead of dropping them, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped traffic) via multiple undeliverable DHCP packets that exceed the input queue size.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Older Cisco IOS releases can mishandle DHCP packets that cannot be delivered. Instead of dropping them, the device queues them until the input queue fills, causing legitimate traffic to be dropped. The business impact is network service disruption, not data theft. The bundle does not provide a CVSS score or evidence of active exploitation. Exposure is most likely on legacy Cisco IOS devices running the listed 12.2-based trains or similar affected versions, especially where DHCP service is enabled unnecessarily. Internet or untrusted-network adjacency increases concern, but the source bundle does not define exact reachable interfaces or device roles. Treat as a targeted legacy network availability risk. Prioritize if affected Cisco IOS devices still support critical routing, switching, or access paths. It is not presented as data compromise, but outage impact can be material for exposed or high-traffic network infrastructure. Mitigation focus: Review Cisco's advisory for fixed IOS releases and platform-specific guidance.; Disable DHCP service with "no service dhcp" where Cisco guidance and operations allow it.; Prioritize legacy edge, access, and transit devices exposed to untrusted networks..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2004-1111 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.