LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2003-0616: Format string vulnerability in ePO service for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 2.0, 2.5, and 2.5.1 allows remot...

Format string vulnerability in ePO service for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 2.0, 2.5, and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a POST request with format strings in the computerlist parameter, which are used when logging a failed name resolution.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

This is a legacy remote code execution issue in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator. A vulnerable ePO service could be abused through malformed input, potentially letting an attacker run code on the management server. Because ePO centrally manages security policy, compromise could have broad operational impact. Exposure is most likely in organizations still running McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 2.0, 2.5, or 2.5.1, especially where the ePO service is reachable from untrusted networks. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, but the description and title identify these versions. Treat this as high priority if any named legacy ePO version still exists. ePO is a security management platform, so server compromise could weaken endpoint security operations. If no affected legacy versions remain, priority shifts to documentation and exposure confirmation. Mitigation focus: Inventory ePO deployments and confirm whether versions 2.0, 2.5, or 2.5.1 remain in use.; Check McAfee/NAI advisory guidance for the historical vendor fix or supported upgrade path.; Retire or isolate unsupported legacy ePO servers where immediate upgrade is not possible..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2003-0616 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.