LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2003-0102: Buffer overflow in tryelf() in readelf.c of the file command allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as...

Buffer overflow in tryelf() in readelf.c of the file command allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as the user running file, possibly via a large entity size value in an ELF header (elfhdr.e_shentsize).

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

CVE-2003-0102 is an old buffer overflow in the Unix file command. A specially crafted ELF file could make file run attacker-controlled code with the permissions of the user or service that analyzes it. Business urgency is mainly for legacy systems or automated pipelines that inspect untrusted files. Exposure is most likely on old Unix/Linux/BSD systems with vulnerable file packages. Risk increases where file is run automatically against uploads, email attachments, archives, malware samples, or user-controlled files. Modern patched distributions are less likely affected, but the provided data does not define safe versions. Prioritize if legacy Unix/Linux/BSD hosts process untrusted files, especially in automated or privileged contexts. For fully supported, patched systems, treat as routine verification. Because this is a 2003 issue with no KEV signal in the bundle, urgency is driven by legacy exposure rather than current campaign evidence. Mitigation focus: Inventory systems that include the file package or bundled file/libmagic components.; Apply the relevant OS vendor security update for supported platforms.; For unsupported legacy systems, consult vendor guidance or retire the affected image..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2003-0102 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.