LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2001-0053: One-byte buffer overflow in replydirname function in BSD-based ftpd allows remote attackers to gain root pr...

One-byte buffer overflow in replydirname function in BSD-based ftpd allows remote attackers to gain root privileges.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2001-0053 is a remote buffer overflow in the replydirname function of BSD-based ftpd. The CVE description says successful exploitation could give an attacker root privileges. This is mainly urgent for organizations still running legacy BSD-derived FTP services exposed to networks.

Executive priority

Prioritize if any BSD-based FTP service is internet-facing or supports sensitive systems. If no legacy FTP is present, urgency is lower. The main business concern is possible full system compromise on obsolete exposed services.

Technical view

The issue is described as a one-byte buffer overflow in BSD-based ftpd's replydirname function. Public details in the provided sources are sparse: no CVSS score, no specific affected vendor/version list, and no confirmed patch reference are included.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on legacy BSD-based systems or appliances running ftpd, especially where FTP is reachable from untrusted networks. The provided CVE data does not identify exact products, versions, or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is remotely reachable and tied to root privilege compromise, but the provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or current active exploitation evidence. Treat internet-facing legacy FTP as higher risk due to the impact.

Researcher notes

The public bundle provides only a concise CVE description and an IBM X-Force entry reference. Affected versions, fixes, and exploitation details are not established here. Further platform-specific vendor research is required before making remediation claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems running BSD-based ftpd or legacy FTP services.
  • Check operating system or appliance vendor guidance for fixed ftpd packages.
  • Disable FTP where it is not required.
  • Restrict FTP access to trusted networks only.
  • Migrate to supported, encrypted file transfer services where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Identify hosts listening for FTP services.
  • Confirm the FTP daemon implementation and package version.
  • Compare findings against vendor advisories for the specific platform.
  • Review exposure from internet and untrusted network segments.
  • Check logs for unusual FTP activity, without assuming exploitation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2001-0053 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.