LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2000-0762: The default installation of eTrust Access Control (formerly SeOS) uses a default encryption key, which allo...

The default installation of eTrust Access Control (formerly SeOS) uses a default encryption key, which allows remote attackers to spoof the eTrust administrator and gain privileges.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Older installations of eTrust Access Control (formerly SeOS) shipped with a built-in encryption key that every customer received by default. Anyone who knew that key could impersonate the security administrator over the network and take control of protected systems. The issue affects default installs that were never hardened, and it is a legacy exposure from 2000 that should have been remediated long ago on any still-running host. Exposure is limited to legacy environments still running unhardened eTrust Access Control / SeOS deployments from around 2000. Modern estates should have no material exposure, but any surviving host with default keys and network-reachable admin services would allow spoofed administrator control. The bundle does not list specific vendor or version data, so scope must be confirmed against internal asset inventory. Low priority for most modern organizations because the product and vulnerability are from 2000. However, if any legacy eTrust/SeOS system remains in production, treat this as a high-priority remediation: default keys allow full administrative takeover, and the underlying access-control tier protects sensitive systems. Confirm scope with IT asset management before deprioritizing. Mitigation focus: Replace the default encryption key with a unique, strong key per the CA/Broadcom eTrust advisory.; Restrict network access to eTrust administrative services to trusted management hosts only.; Retire or upgrade any eTrust Access Control / SeOS installations still running legacy 2000-era builds..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2000-0762 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.