LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2000-0116: Firewall-1 does not properly filter script tags, which allows remote attackers to bypass the "Strip Script...

Firewall-1 does not properly filter script tags, which allows remote attackers to bypass the "Strip Script Tags" restriction by including an extra < in front of the SCRIPT tag.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysis

Security readout for executives and security teams

Check Point Firewall-1's content filter was supposed to strip out embedded web script tags to protect internal users from malicious pages, but attackers could sneak scripts past it by adding an extra "<" character in front of the SCRIPT tag. This meant the firewall's advertised "Strip Script Tags" protection could be bypassed, exposing users to hostile scripts the product was expected to block. Exposure is limited to legacy Check Point Firewall-1 deployments from circa 2000 relying on the "Strip Script Tags" HTTP content filter. Modern environments do not use this control, and the sources do not list specific affected versions or CPEs. Any organization still running that era's Firewall-1 in production would have far larger unsupported-software risks than this single filter bypass. Very low priority for modern environments. This is a 2000-era filter-bypass in a long-obsolete Check Point Firewall-1 feature, with no KEV listing and no cited active exploitation. It only matters if legacy Firewall-1 gear is still deployed, in which case the broader concern is unsupported infrastructure, not this single CVE. Mitigation focus: Confirm whether any legacy Check Point Firewall-1 instances remain in use and consult current Check Point guidance for supported successors.; Do not rely on the legacy 'Strip Script Tags' option as a browser protection; layer modern web filtering and endpoint controls instead.; Retire or upgrade unsupported Firewall-1 platforms as part of standard end-of-life hygiene..

Prepared

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2000-0116 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
1Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.