LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2000-0065: Buffer overflow in InetServ 3.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands via a long GET request.

Buffer overflow in InetServ 3.0 allows remote attackers to execute commands via a long GET request.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

InetServ 3.0, an older web/mail server product, has a flaw where sending it an oversized web request can crash it or let an attacker run commands on the server. This is a legacy issue from 2000; risk today depends entirely on whether any InetServ 3.0 instance is still exposed anywhere in the environment.

Executive priority

Low priority for most organizations because InetServ 3.0 is effectively obsolete. Priority becomes high only if inventory confirms an active deployment, in which case immediate isolation or replacement is warranted. Treat as an asset-hygiene exercise rather than an emergency response.

Technical view

Per the CVE record, InetServ 3.0 contains a buffer overflow triggered by a long HTTP GET request, permitting remote command execution. No CWE, CVSS, or patch details are supplied in the source bundle. The referenced XForce entry is the only enrichment link. Affected vendor and product metadata are marked "n/a," so mapping to modern inventory requires manual identification of InetServ deployments.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely very limited. InetServ 3.0 is a discontinued product from around 2000; modern enterprises rarely run it. Any surviving instance exposed to the internet or an untrusted network would be at high risk given the unauthenticated remote nature of the flaw described in the source.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, and the source bundle cites no public exploit, malware, or in-the-wild activity. The described vector — a long GET request causing an overflow with command execution — is characteristic of pre-authentication remote code execution in early web servers, but active exploitation cannot be asserted from the provided sources.

Researcher notes

Source bundle is minimal: no CVSS, no CWE, no affected CPE, and a single XForce reference. The description implies pre-auth RCE via HTTP GET overflow, but no exploit, PoC, or patch is cited. KEV=false. Given the product's age, most value comes from confirming absence via inventory rather than deep technical analysis. Flag any positive discovery for immediate remediation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory for any InetServ 3.0 instances across servers, appliances, and legacy VMs.
  • Retire or replace InetServ 3.0 with a supported web server product.
  • If retirement is not immediate, remove the service from internet exposure and restrict via firewall or VPN.
  • Consult vendor or archived vendor guidance for any late-cycle patches before relying on the software.
  • Monitor perimeter logs for abnormally long GET requests targeting suspected InetServ hosts.

Validation and detection

  • Scan network ranges for HTTP banners identifying InetServ or its default response signatures.
  • Correlate asset management data for any historical InetServ deployments still powered on.
  • Review web server logs for unusually long URIs indicative of overflow probing.
  • Confirm firewall and segmentation rules block untrusted access to any legacy web services discovered.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2000-0065 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.