LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-1999-0636: The discard service is running.

The discard service is running.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A system has the "discard" network service turned on. Discard is an old diagnostic service that accepts any data sent to it and throws it away. It provides no business value on modern systems and simply expands the attack surface, giving outsiders another open port to probe, fingerprint, or abuse for traffic amplification.

Executive priority

Low priority. This is a hygiene issue, not an active threat. Fold remediation into normal hardening and configuration reviews rather than emergency patching. Business impact only rises if discard is exposed to the internet on production infrastructure.

Technical view

CVE-1999-0636 flags the presence of the discard service (TCP/UDP port 9, RFC 863). The service silently consumes any input and returns nothing. The public record lists no vendor, product, CVSS score, or CWE. It is a configuration/hygiene finding rather than a code flaw, treated as an unnecessary listening service that should be disabled on modern hosts.

Likely exposure

Legacy Unix, BSD, and older Windows hosts where inetd/xinetd or simpTCP services were enabled by default. Exposure today is limited but occasionally surfaces on embedded appliances, printers, and forgotten legacy servers. Not tied to a specific vendor in the CVE record.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing and no cited evidence of active exploitation. The sources describe a service exposure, not a weaponizable vulnerability. Historically the concern is reconnaissance value, unnecessary attack surface, and potential misuse of UDP discard for traffic reflection or amplification patterns.

Researcher notes

Record is a minimal 1999-era configuration finding with no CVSS, CWE, or affected product data. Treat findings as informational and correlate with sibling entries for other simple TCP services (echo, chargen, daytime). Verify presence with targeted port 9 probes and service banner review; escalate only if paired with amplification or reflection concerns.

Mitigation direction

  • Disable the discard service on TCP and UDP port 9 across all hosts.
  • Remove or comment out discard entries in inetd/xinetd or equivalent service managers.
  • Block inbound TCP/UDP port 9 at perimeter and internal segmentation firewalls.
  • Add discard-service checks to hardening baselines and configuration management.
  • Consult vendor hardening guidance for any appliance still shipping simple TCP services.

Validation and detection

  • Scan internal and external ranges for open TCP and UDP port 9 listeners.
  • Review host service inventories for 'discard' entries in inetd, xinetd, or systemd.
  • Confirm firewall rules deny inbound port 9 traffic and log any hits.
  • Re-scan after remediation to verify the service no longer responds.
  • Track exceptions and document any legacy system that still requires the service.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
2

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-1999-0636 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.