LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-1999-0259: cfingerd lists all users on a system via search.**@target.

cfingerd lists all users on a system via search.**@target.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An old version of cfingerd, a Unix "finger" service, responds to a wildcard query (search.**@target) by returning a full list of user accounts on the machine. Attackers can use that list to plan password guessing or social engineering. The service is rarely exposed today, so business risk is low unless a legacy system still runs it on the network.

Executive priority

Low priority for most organizations. Treat as a hygiene item during legacy system reviews or attack surface reduction; no emergency action indicated by the sources.

Technical view

Per the source bundle, cfingerd enumerates all local users when queried with a wildcard pattern such as search.**@target, leaking the account namespace over the finger protocol (TCP/79). No CVSS, CWE, or affected version data is provided in the record, and the only reference is an X-Force entry. This is an information disclosure weakness that undermines account confidentiality but does not itself grant code execution or authentication bypass.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to hosts still running cfingerd with the finger port reachable from untrusted networks. Modern enterprises rarely deploy finger, but the risk persists on legacy Unix systems, research hosts, or forgotten appliances retained for backwards compatibility.

Exploitation context

Not listed in CISA KEV and no cited source claims active exploitation. The technique is trivial and publicly documented as a reconnaissance aid, so opportunistic use against exposed finger daemons should be assumed wherever the service is still running.

Researcher notes

The CVE record contains no affected vendor, version, CVSS, or CWE metadata, and cites only an X-Force reference. Confidence in scope is limited by that gap. Analysts should treat this as a historical information-disclosure issue in cfingerd and confirm the specific build in use before assuming presence or absence of the flaw.

Mitigation direction

  • Disable the finger service on internet-facing and internal hosts unless there is a documented business need.
  • Block inbound TCP/79 at perimeter and host firewalls.
  • If cfingerd must remain, consult vendor or distribution guidance for a fixed build or restrictive configuration.
  • Restrict finger responses to authenticated or allow-listed sources only.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts for cfingerd or any finger daemon listening on TCP/79.
  • From an authorized test host, query the finger service with a benign user string and confirm it does not return full user rosters.
  • Review firewall and network ACLs to confirm TCP/79 is denied from untrusted zones.
  • Check vendor advisories and the referenced X-Force entry for any named fixed version relevant to the deployed build.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-1999-0259 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.