DET0038: Detection Strategy for Hijack Execution Flow using Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness
MITRE ATT&CK DET0038: Detection Strategy for Hijack Execution Flow using Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness Detection Strategy details, with detection…
Security context for executives and security teams
This detection strategy matters because it is tied to a Windows execution-flow hijack scenario where weak permissions on installer-related binaries or directories can let a user-level actor replace a binary that a legitimate installer process later runs. For leaders, the practical issue is control assurance: are software installation paths and installer-executed binaries protected well enough, and would the SOC notice suspicious replacement or execution activity before it becomes a persistence, stealth, or execution problem?
Executive priority
Prioritize this as a validation item for endpoint hardening, software deployment governance, and incident response readiness. The ATT&CK object itself has no official description or detection logic, so the business decision is not whether a named analytic is present, but whether Windows systems have defensible file-permission baselines, audit evidence for installer paths, and telemetry that can support investigation when installer-related execution appears abnormal.
Technical view
DET0038 is a detection strategy object that detects T1574.005, Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness. The related ATT&CK technique is in the enterprise domain, associated with Windows, and linked to stealth and execution. SOC and detection teams should validate visibility into permission weaknesses and file replacement activity around installer-used binaries, then correlate that with process execution by legitimate installer or software maintenance processes. Because the detection strategy has no official detection text, teams should treat this as a coverage-engineering prompt rather than a ready-made analytic.
Likely telemetry
- Windows file system permission and ownership data for installer directories and installer-executed binaries
- File creation, modification, overwrite, and rename events affecting binaries in software installation paths
- Process execution telemetry showing installer or software maintenance processes launching binaries
- Endpoint security alerts or audit records related to suspicious binary replacement or execution from writable locations
- Change-management or software deployment records to distinguish authorized installer activity from unexpected changes
Detection direction
- Confirm whether installer-related directories and binaries are inventoried and whether weak write permissions can be identified at scale.
- Correlate binary modification events with later execution by installer or updater processes, with attention to user-writable locations.
- Tune detections against approved software installation and update workflows to reduce false positives from legitimate deployment tools.
- Review blind spots where file permission state, file modification events, or process lineage are not collected from Windows endpoints.
- Use the relationship to T1574.005 as the technical anchor; do not assume DET0038 provides complete logic because no official detection field is supplied.
Mitigation priorities
- Establish and validate least-privilege file permissions for software installation directories and installer-executed binaries.
- Use software deployment and change-management controls to define what legitimate installer activity should look like.
- Prioritize remediation of writable installer paths or binaries that can be modified by standard users.
- Ensure endpoint logging and retention are sufficient for incident responders to reconstruct file replacement and execution timelines.
- Maintain audit evidence showing that high-risk installation paths are permissioned, monitored, and periodically reviewed.
Additional notes and limits
The strongest use of this object is as a coverage checklist for T1574.005 rather than as a specific analytic. Detection engineering should be driven by local Windows software inventory, installer behavior, endpoint telemetry quality, and known administrative deployment patterns.
The supplied ATT&CK detection strategy has no official description, no official detection text, no listed platforms, and no tactics of its own. Windows, stealth, and execution context come only from the relationship to T1574.005. Local environment evidence is required to determine actual exposure, detection coverage, and control effectiveness.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Detection Strategy for Hijack Execution Flow using Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness
No official description is available in the imported ATT&CK source object.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise | T1574.005 | Executable Installer File Permissions WeaknessSub-technique | This object detects Executable Installer File Permissions Weakness. |
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Current bundle | ce390b687549… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]mitre-attackDET0038Open source URL
- [2]mitre-attackDET0038Open source URL
- [3]mitre-attackDET0038Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.