DC0070: Cloud Service Metadata
Cloud service metadata refers to the contextual and descriptive information about cloud services, including their name, type, purpose, configuration, and activity around them. This metadata is essential for understanding the roles and functions of cloud services, their operational status, and their potential misuse. Examples:
- Azure Service Metadata: Metadata describing a resource in Azure, such as an Azure Storage Account or a Virtual Machine. - AWS Cloud Service Metadata: Metadata for an AWS EC2 instance collected using the `DescribeInstances` API call. - Google Cloud Service Metadata: Metadata for a Google Compute Engine instance collected using `gcloud compute instances describe`. - Office 365 Metadata: Metadata about an Office 365 SharePoint site.
Security context for executives and security teams
DC0070: Cloud Service Metadata describes Cloud service metadata refers to the contextual and descriptive information about cloud services, including their name, type, purpose, configuration, and activity around them. This metadata is essential for understanding the roles and functions of cloud services, their operational status, and their potential misuse. Examples: - Azure Service Metadata: Metadata describing a resource in Azure, such as an Azure Storage Account or a Virtual Machine. - AWS Cloud Service Metadata: Metadata for an AWS EC2 instance collect...
Executive priority
DC0070: Cloud Service Metadata is an official MITRE ATT&CK data component. Glexia treats it as defensive behavior context for prioritizing monitoring, control validation, and response planning without using the object by itself as an attribution claim.
Technical view
Security teams should validate DC0070: Cloud Service Metadata by reviewing the official ATT&CK relationships, mapped tactics (the mapped ATT&CK tactic context), supported platforms (the platforms named in the official object), and available local telemetry before making detection or mitigation decisions.
Likely telemetry
- Official ATT&CK relationships and object metadata
Detection direction
- Validate whether DC0070: Cloud Service Metadata appears in your detection coverage and tabletop scenarios.
- Use the object to align executive risk language with SOC, incident response, and detection engineering work.
- Do not treat ATT&CK relationship context as attribution without corroborating evidence.
Mitigation priorities
- Map the object to existing controls and identify missing telemetry or response ownership.
- Prioritize mitigations that reduce exposure on the listed platforms and tactics.
- Review adjacent ATT&CK relationships before changing policy, detections, or reporting language.
Additional notes and limits
Baseline Glexia take generated from the official MITRE ATT&CK STIX object, source hash, tactics, platforms, and detection fields. It is safe to replace with a richer model-generated take for the same source hash later.
This baseline take is source-grounded and schema-validated, but it does not include environment-specific telemetry, incident evidence, or threat-intelligence corroboration.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Cloud Service Metadata
Cloud service metadata refers to the contextual and descriptive information about cloud services, including their name, type, purpose, configuration, and activity around them. This metadata is essential for understanding the roles and functions of cloud services, their operational status, and their potential misuse. Examples:
- Azure Service Metadata: Metadata describing a resource in Azure, such as an Azure Storage Account or a Virtual Machine. - AWS Cloud Service Metadata: Metadata for an AWS EC2 instance collected using the `DescribeInstances` API call. - Google Cloud Service Metadata: Metadata for a Google Compute Engine instance collected using `gcloud compute instances describe`. - Office 365 Metadata: Metadata about an Office 365 SharePoint site.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
All related ATT&CK context
No relationships are available in the current normalized data for this object.
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates.
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases(3)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 2.0 | Older bundle | 984b5a2c34e0… | ||
| 19.2 | 2.0 | Current bundle | 984b5a2c34e0… | ||
| 19.1 | 2.0 | Older bundle | 984b5a2c34e0… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
- [1]mitre-attackDC0070Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.