DET0775: Detection of Loss of Protection
This detection strategy matters because it is tied to an ICS technique where protective functions may be compromised, potentially allowing faults or abnorm...
Analyst context for executives and security teams
This detection strategy matters because it is tied to an ICS technique where protective functions may be compromised, potentially allowing faults or abnormal process conditions to progress faster than human operators can respond. For executives and security leaders, the business issue is not only cyber intrusion detection; it is whether the organization can prove that safety and protection layers remain observable, monitored, and governed during an incident.
Executive priority
Prioritize this as a cyber-physical resilience and assurance topic. Leaders should ask whether protective system status, changes, alarms, bypasses, and failures are visible to operations, SOC, and incident response teams, and whether evidence is available for audits or post-incident review. Because the ATT&CK object provides no platform, tactic, or detection detail, investment decisions should be driven by local ICS architecture, safety-critical process risk, and the business consequence of impaired protection functions.
Technical view
The supplied ATT&CK object is a detection strategy for Loss of Protection (T0837), but it does not include official detection logic, platforms, or tactics. SOC, OT security, and IR teams should therefore validate coverage around the related behavior: compromise or disabling of protective functions intended to prevent damage, disruption, or personnel hazards. Practical validation should focus on whether protection-related state changes, abnormal conditions, alarms, engineering changes, and operator/security events are captured, time-synchronized, and reviewable across OT monitoring and incident workflows.
Likely telemetry
- Protective system status and health indicators where available
- Alarms or events indicating disabled, bypassed, inhibited, failed, or unavailable protection functions
- Engineering workstation or configuration change records related to protective functions
- Operator action logs and acknowledgement records for protection-related alarms
- Process historian or control system events showing abnormal conditions and protective response outcomes
Detection direction
- Treat the lack of official detection text as a coverage-validation gap: define local analytic requirements from the protected process and safety architecture.
- Validate that monitoring distinguishes authorized maintenance, testing, or bypass activity from unexpected or unexplained loss of protective function.
- Tune detections with operations and safety personnel to reduce false positives during planned shutdowns, proof testing, commissioning, or maintenance windows.
- Confirm that telemetry is available quickly enough to support response, since the related technique notes that some abnormal conditions occur too quickly for human reaction.
- Correlate protection-related events with change records, user activity, asset context, and process conditions rather than relying on a single alarm source.
Mitigation priorities
- Start with governance: identify which protective functions are safety- or continuity-critical and who owns monitoring, approval, and escalation.
- Ensure changes, bypasses, disables, and testing of protective functions require authorization and produce reviewable records.
- Prioritize visibility for high-consequence protection assets before expanding to lower-risk areas.
- Align SOC, OT operations, safety engineering, and incident response procedures so protection-related events trigger the right operational decision path.
- Regularly test whether evidence needed to investigate loss of protection is collected, retained, and accessible without disrupting operations.
Analyst notes and limits
This take is based on DET0775 and its stated relationship to ICS ATT&CK technique T0837, Loss of Protection. The strongest decision value is in validating whether an organization has evidence and response processes for protection-function impairment, not in applying a MITRE-provided analytic, because no official detection content is supplied in the object.
The supplied detection strategy has no official description, detection logic, tactics, platforms, labels, or aliases. The related T0837 description is also truncated in the provided relationship context. Any concrete detection rules, asset-specific assumptions, vendor mappings, or claims of coverage require local engineering and telemetry review.
Detection of Loss of Protection
No official description is available in the imported ATT&CK source object.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
Techniques used
This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.
| Domain | ID | Name | Relationship / procedure |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICS | T0837 | Loss of Protection | This object detects Loss of Protection. |
All related ATT&CK context
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Current bundle | 75a7f6941d91… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
mitre-attack DET0775Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.