Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Detection Strategy

DET0739: Detection of Remote System Discovery

DET0739 is a detection strategy for identifying Remote System Discovery in ICS environments: attempts to list or identify other systems by IP address, host...

ICSDET0739Detection StrategyObject v1.0 Modified
Glexia's Take

Analyst context for executives and security teams

Analyst confidence Medium

DET0739 is a detection strategy for identifying Remote System Discovery in ICS environments: attempts to list or identify other systems by IP address, hostname, or other logical identifier. For leaders, the practical issue is that discovery is often a precursor to lateral movement and broader operational visibility by an adversary. Even without platform-specific guidance in the ATT&CK object, this behavior matters because weak visibility into asset enumeration can leave SOC and incident response teams late to understand scope, containment needs, and potential operational risk.

Executive priority

Prioritize confirming whether security teams can see and investigate system-enumeration activity across ICS-connected networks. The business question is not only “can we detect scans,” but “can we distinguish authorized engineering, asset management, and vendor activity from suspicious discovery that could precede lateral movement.” This supports operational resilience, incident decision-making, and compliance evidence around monitoring of critical environments.

Technical view

This detection strategy is related to ATT&CK for ICS technique T0846, Remote System Discovery. The supplied object does not specify platforms, tactics, or official detection logic, so validation should be environment-driven. SOC and IR teams should map normal sources of host, IP, and network inventory activity in ICS networks, then test whether telemetry can identify unusual enumeration patterns, unexpected hosts performing discovery, or discovery occurring outside approved maintenance or engineering workflows. Because legitimate operating system utilities, vendor software, or adversary tooling may be involved, detection should focus on context, source, destination, frequency, timing, and authorization rather than a single tool name.

Likely telemetry

  • Network flow records showing source and destination IPs, ports, protocols, timing, and connection volume
  • DNS, hostname lookup, or name-resolution logs where available
  • Asset inventory and network discovery tool logs for authorized baseline activity
  • Firewall, router, switch, or segmentation control logs showing cross-zone connection attempts
  • Endpoint or server logs from systems that can record discovery commands or administrative utility use, where present

Detection direction

  • Build a baseline of approved discovery behavior, including engineering workstations, asset management systems, vendor tools, and scheduled scans.
  • Tune for unexpected systems initiating broad host, IP, or hostname enumeration, especially across ICS network segments or trust boundaries.
  • Correlate discovery activity with subsequent lateral movement or additional discovery behaviors, since T0846 is described as enabling later activity.
  • Avoid relying only on signature-style detection for known tools; the related technique notes that operating system utilities, vendor software, or adversary tools could be used.
  • Account for false positives from legitimate maintenance, commissioning, vulnerability assessment, inventory collection, and vendor support.

Mitigation priorities

  • Define and document authorized discovery sources, schedules, and maintenance windows for ICS-connected environments.
  • Limit and monitor which systems can enumerate or communicate broadly across ICS network segments.
  • Use segmentation and access controls to reduce unnecessary host-to-host visibility where operationally feasible.
  • Ensure asset inventory, change management, and vendor access processes provide context to the SOC for triage.
  • Create incident response playbooks for unexpected discovery in ICS networks, including operational escalation paths before containment actions that could affect production or safety.
Analyst notes and limits

The ATT&CK object is a detection strategy with no official description or detection text provided. The most useful context comes from its relationship to T0846 Remote System Discovery in the ICS domain, which describes adversaries attempting to list other systems by IP address, hostname, or logical identifier for possible subsequent lateral movement or discovery. Local baselines and architecture are essential because the same behavior may be normal during engineering, inventory, or vendor maintenance activities.

Platforms, tactics, labels, aliases, official description, and official detection content are not specified in the supplied object. This take does not assert active exploitation, actor attribution, affected products, guaranteed detection, or specific tool coverage. Recommendations are generalized from the supplied relationship to T0846 and require validation against the organization’s ICS architecture and telemetry.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Detection of Remote System Discovery

No official description is available in the imported ATT&CK source object.

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

1 rows
Domain ID Name Relationship / procedure
ICS T0846 Remote System Discovery This object detects Remote System Discovery.
Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
bdc099cbdd64d118...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
Release Bundle imported Object version Modified Status Raw hash
19.1 1.0 Current bundle bdc099cbdd64…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    mitre-attack DET0739
    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.