Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Detection Strategy

DET0632: Detection of Process Injection

DET0632 is a MITRE ATT&CK detection strategy object for detecting mobile Process Injection, but MITRE provides no official description or detection logic f...

MobileDET0632Detection StrategyObject v1.0 Modified
Glexia's Take

Analyst context for executives and security teams

Analyst confidence Medium

DET0632 is a MITRE ATT&CK detection strategy object for detecting mobile Process Injection, but MITRE provides no official description or detection logic for the strategy itself. Its practical value is as a coverage prompt: leaders and defenders should verify whether mobile security monitoring can identify code executing inside another live process, because that behavior may bypass process-based controls or run with the resources and privileges of the targeted process.

Executive priority

Treat this as a mobile defense validation item rather than a ready-made analytic. For Android and iOS environments, ask whether current mobile security, incident response, and compliance evidence can show when process boundaries are abused. The business risk is reduced visibility: if monitoring only trusts process names or application identity, injected execution may appear to come from a legitimate process, complicating incident decisions and audit confidence.

Technical view

The supplied relationship states that DET0632 detects T1631 Process Injection in the mobile ATT&CK domain, with related platforms Android and iOS. SOC and IR teams should validate whether they collect evidence that can distinguish normal process behavior from arbitrary code running in another process address space. Because MITRE provides no official detection text, local analytic design should be based on mobile OS telemetry, memory/process integrity signals, and correlation with application behavior rather than on a predefined ATT&CK analytic.

Likely telemetry

  • Mobile endpoint or MTD/EDR process execution and process metadata where available
  • Application identity, signing, entitlement, permission, and sandbox context
  • Memory or process integrity signals indicating unexpected code mapped into a live process
  • Security product alerts that reference injection, tampering, hooking, or abnormal in-process execution
  • Mobile system logs relevant to process creation, crashes, privilege context, or abnormal resource access

Detection direction

  • Validate that detections do not rely only on process name or application reputation, since the related technique may mask execution under a legitimate process.
  • Correlate process-context anomalies with application signing, permission use, memory integrity, and unexpected network or resource access.
  • Tune carefully for legitimate mobile platform behavior, security tooling, debugging, accessibility, or enterprise management functions that may resemble process manipulation.
  • Confirm coverage separately for Android and iOS if those platforms are in scope; the detection strategy object itself does not list platforms, but the related technique does.
  • Document gaps where mobile OS restrictions, privacy controls, or lack of endpoint telemetry prevent direct observation.

Mitigation priorities

  • Prioritize visibility first: confirm what mobile process, application, integrity, and security-alert telemetry is actually available.
  • Harden mobile application and device management baselines where applicable, including least privilege, trusted application sources, and control of debugging or management features.
  • Use mobile threat detection or endpoint controls that can provide behavioral and integrity evidence, not only inventory or compliance posture.
  • Prepare IR playbooks to preserve mobile evidence and investigate suspicious activity attributed to legitimate processes.
  • Map validated telemetry and controls to audit evidence so leadership can distinguish assumed coverage from tested coverage.
Analyst notes and limits

This take is based on the detection strategy object DET0632 and its relationship to T1631 Process Injection. The source object has no official description, no official detection guidance, no tactics, and no platforms listed; Android and iOS are included only because they are supplied on the related technique.

MITRE’s supplied fields do not provide detection logic, data sources, mitigations, or implementation details for DET0632. Any concrete analytic, tooling recommendation, or coverage statement requires local environment evidence and testing.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Detection of Process Injection

No official description is available in the imported ATT&CK source object.

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

ATT&CK relationship table

Techniques used

This mirrors the MITRE pattern of making group, software, campaign, and technique relationships scannable. Relationship notes come from mirrored ATT&CK relationship text when available.

1 rows
Domain ID Name Relationship / procedure
Mobile T1631 Process Injection This object detects Process Injection.
Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
314a81db7b304753...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
Release Bundle imported Object version Modified Status Raw hash
19.1 1.0 Current bundle 314a81db7b30…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    mitre-attack DET0632
    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.