AN1889: Analytic 1889
No standard detection method currently exists for this technique.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
This ATT&CK ICS detection analytic is mainly important because MITRE states that no standard detection method currently exists for the associated technique. For leaders, the value is not a ready-made rule; it is a coverage warning. If this behavior is relevant to the organization’s industrial environment, teams should treat it as a gap requiring local engineering, compensating controls, and clear incident-response assumptions rather than expecting an off-the-shelf analytic to provide assurance.
Executive priority
Prioritize this as a risk and assurance question: do we understand whether this ICS behavior matters to our operations, and if so, what evidence would prove we could notice, investigate, or contain it? Because no platform, tactic, or detection logic is supplied, executives should not accept generic detection coverage claims without environment-specific validation, documented telemetry availability, and compensating control evidence.
Technical view
SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams should treat AN1889 as an analytic gap, not an implementable detection. The official object provides no platforms, tactics, relationships, or detection procedure. Validation should start by mapping the parent detection strategy or related technique in the local ATT&CK knowledge base, identifying the affected ICS assets and protocols from local architecture, and determining what telemetry could support investigation. Any detection content should be locally developed, tested against approved engineering data, and documented with assumptions and blind spots.
Likely telemetry
- ICS asset inventory and network architecture records
- Industrial network traffic captures or flow metadata, where available
- Controller, engineering workstation, historian, and operator workstation logs, where collected
- Change-management and maintenance records for industrial systems
- Incident-response notes documenting what evidence is available or unavailable
Detection direction
- Do not mark this analytic as covered solely because AN1889 exists; MITRE provides no standard detection method.
- Validate whether the related behavior is applicable to the organization’s ICS environment before investing in custom detection.
- Document telemetry gaps explicitly, especially where industrial systems do not generate logs or where collection could affect reliability.
- Use local baselining and engineering context to reduce false positives if custom detections are developed.
- Require evidence-based coverage claims: data source, collection point, retention, parsing quality, test method, and known blind spots.
Mitigation priorities
- Start with scoping: determine whether the associated ICS behavior is relevant to critical processes or regulated environments.
- Establish compensating controls where detection is immature, such as asset visibility, change control, segmentation, access governance, and response procedures appropriate to the environment.
- Improve evidence readiness by confirming what industrial telemetry can be collected safely and retained for investigation.
- Create an IR playbook assumption for this gap so responders know what evidence is missing and what operational stakeholders must be involved.
- Review coverage periodically as MITRE or internal engineering produces more specific detection guidance.
Analyst notes and limits
The key takeaway is the absence of standardized detection guidance. That makes this object useful for governance, gap tracking, and detection engineering backlog prioritization, but not as a direct SOC rule. Any stronger statement requires additional ATT&CK relationships, the underlying technique context, and local ICS architecture details.
The supplied ATT&CK fields are sparse: no platforms, tactics, detection logic, data sources, relationships, aliases, or supporting references beyond the MITRE URL. This take therefore cannot identify specific systems, protocols, adversaries, impacts, or validated detections.
Analytic 1889
No standard detection method currently exists for this technique.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
All related ATT&CK context
No relationships are available in the current normalized data for this object.
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Current bundle | 7cdb58387238… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
mitre-attack AN1889Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.