AN1865: Analytic 1865
No standard detection method currently exists for this technique.
Analyst context for executives and security teams
AN1865 is an ICS ATT&CK detection analytic whose key business message is a coverage gap: MITRE states that no standard detection method currently exists for the referenced technique, and no platform, tactic, or relationship context is supplied here. For leaders, this should be treated as a prompt to verify whether the organization is relying on assumptions rather than evidence for this area of ICS monitoring.
Executive priority
Prioritize this as a risk-governance and assurance question, not as a claim of current exposure or active threat activity. Security and operations leaders should ask whether the relevant ICS process, asset class, or control environment is understood well enough to define local detection objectives, compensating controls, incident response playbooks, and audit evidence despite the absence of a standard ATT&CK detection method.
Technical view
SOC, detection engineering, and IR teams should not treat AN1865 as deployable detection logic. The official ATT&CK content provides no detection procedure, no platform scope, no tactics, and no relationship context. The practical task is to perform local validation: identify the related DET0732/AN1865 context in the ATT&CK source, map it to the organization’s ICS architecture, determine what observable evidence could exist in that environment, and document whether monitoring is feasible, unavailable, or dependent on compensating operational controls.
Likely telemetry
- Locally identified ICS asset inventory and architecture records
- Available control-system, engineering-workstation, server, network, and security monitoring logs, if applicable to the local environment
- Incident response and operational event records that could support retrospective analysis
- Documentation showing where telemetry is unavailable, incomplete, or not standardized
Detection direction
- Do not mark this analytic as covered solely because it exists in ATT&CK; MITRE states no standard detection method currently exists.
- Validate whether local environments produce any relevant evidence before writing detection logic or SOC runbooks.
- Record blind spots explicitly, especially where ICS visibility, logging, or asset context is absent.
- Use environment-specific baselining and engineering input before deciding whether any alerting would be reliable, because no official detection guidance or false-positive criteria are supplied.
Mitigation priorities
- First, confirm the business process, ICS assets, and operational dependencies relevant to the ATT&CK detection strategy context.
- Second, document monitoring gaps and ownership so risk owners understand where detection cannot currently be evidenced.
- Third, use compensating governance measures such as response procedures, access/control reviews, change management, and resilience planning where technical detection is not defined by ATT&CK.
- Finally, revisit the analytic when ATT&CK or internal engineering knowledge provides more specific detection guidance.
Analyst notes and limits
This object is useful mainly because it signals the absence of standardized detection guidance. Its value for Glexia-style decision support is in driving evidence-based conversations between security, operations, and risk teams: what can be observed, what cannot, who owns the gap, and what compensating controls are acceptable.
The supplied ATT&CK fields are sparse: no official detection text, no platforms, no tactics, and no relationships are provided. This take cannot infer affected systems, attacker behavior, detection logic, impact, attribution, or coverage without additional ATT&CK context or local environment evidence.
Analytic 1865
No standard detection method currently exists for this technique.
How security teams should use this page
Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.
All related ATT&CK context
No relationships are available in the current normalized data for this object.
Object version and sync metadata
The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
| Release | Bundle imported | Object version | Modified | Status | Raw hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 | 1.0 | Current bundle | 27b12b158e74… |
Mirrored ATT&CK source object
The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.
External references and citations
MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.
-
[1]
mitre-attack AN1865Open source URL
Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.