Live Active security incident? Get immediate response
MITRE ATT&CK® Analytic

AN1048: Analytic 1048

Correlated use of sleep/delay mechanisms (e.g., kernel32!Sleep, NTDLL APIs) in short-lived processes, combined with parent processes invoking suspicious scripts (e.g., wscript, powershell) with minimal user interaction.

EnterpriseAN1048AnalyticObject v1.0 Modified
Glexia's Take

Analyst context for executives and security teams

Analyst confidence Medium

This analytic matters because delayed execution can make suspicious Windows activity harder for SOC teams to see in a single event. The supplied ATT&CK description focuses on short-lived processes using sleep or delay APIs, especially when launched by script-capable parents such as wscript or PowerShell with little user interaction. For leaders, the decision value is whether endpoint and process telemetry is rich enough to correlate parent script execution, process lifetime, and delay behavior rather than relying only on obvious command-line indicators.

Executive priority

Prioritize this as a validation item for Windows endpoint detection and incident response readiness. It is most relevant to organizations that depend on script controls, EDR process telemetry, and SOC correlation logic to investigate suspicious execution. Executives should ask whether teams can prove visibility into parent-child process chains, script-host activity, short-lived processes, and API-level delay behavior, and whether that evidence is retained long enough to support incident decisions and audit/compliance narratives.

Technical view

For SOC and detection engineering, validate whether Windows telemetry can correlate three elements from the ATT&CK analytic: short-lived child processes, use of sleep/delay mechanisms such as kernel32!Sleep or NTDLL APIs, and suspicious parent script execution such as wscript or powershell with minimal user interaction. Because ATT&CK does not provide a detection implementation or tactic mapping for this analytic, treat it as a coverage design pattern rather than a ready rule. IR teams should confirm that process lineage, command-line context, script-host activity, timestamps, and any available API/behavioral telemetry can be reconstructed during an investigation.

Likely telemetry

  • Windows process creation and termination events, including process lifetime
  • Parent-child process lineage for script hosts and spawned processes
  • Command-line and script execution context for wscript and powershell where collected
  • Endpoint behavioral telemetry showing sleep or delay API usage, where available
  • User interaction context or session context, where available

Detection direction

  • Test correlation logic against benign administrative scripts and automation to understand false positives from legitimate delays and scheduled/scripted activity.
  • Validate that short-lived processes are not missed because of collection latency, sampling, event loss, or retention limits.
  • Correlate parent script invocation with child process behavior instead of alerting on sleep/delay behavior alone, since delay mechanisms can be legitimate.
  • Tune around local baselines for PowerShell, wscript, automation frameworks, and software installers.
  • Document blind spots where API-level telemetry for kernel32!Sleep or NTDLL delay behavior is unavailable; compensate with process lineage and timing analysis where possible.

Mitigation priorities

  • First, ensure Windows endpoint logging and EDR policy capture process lineage, command-line context, and script-host activity.
  • Next, review controls governing script execution and administrative automation so legitimate use is understood and suspicious parent-child chains are easier to triage.
  • Then, build or tune correlation analytics that combine script parent context, short process duration, and delay behavior rather than relying on any one signal.
  • Finally, include this behavior in incident response evidence checklists so responders know whether telemetry gaps limit conclusions.
Analyst notes and limits

The supplied ATT&CK object is a detection analytic for Windows only. It provides a behavioral description but no official detection text, no tactic mapping, and no relationship context. The strongest use is as a defensive validation scenario for endpoint telemetry and correlation quality, not as a standalone risk statement.

This take is limited to the official fields supplied. It does not establish attacker attribution, active exploitation, business impact, affected products beyond Windows, or guaranteed detection coverage. Local logging architecture, EDR capabilities, script usage patterns, and retention settings are required to determine practical coverage.

Official MITRE ATT&CK definition

Analytic 1048

Correlated use of sleep/delay mechanisms (e.g., kernel32!Sleep, NTDLL APIs) in short-lived processes, combined with parent processes invoking suspicious scripts (e.g., wscript, powershell) with minimal user interaction.

View the same entry on attack.mitre.org (MITRE-hosted reference; in-page links above use the Glexia ATT&CK library.)

Glexia analysis

How security teams should use this page

Treat this object as behavior context, not an attribution claim. Validate the related groups, software, data sources, and mitigations against official ATT&CK relationships and your own telemetry before making control-coverage decisions.

Relationship explorer

All related ATT&CK context

No relationships are available in the current normalized data for this object.

Change history

Object version and sync metadata

The fields below describe the current mirrored snapshot. When Glexia retains multiple ATT&CK source imports, you can open the table to compare the same object across releases (hashes and MITRE timestamps). For MITRE’s own release notes and roadmap, see ATT&CK resources — Updates .

ATT&CK release
19.1
Object version
1.0
Created
Modified
Raw hash
4fea99b82bbd7fa4...
Imported snapshots across ATT&CK releases (1)
Release Bundle imported Object version Modified Status Raw hash
19.1 1.0 Current bundle 4fea99b82bbd…
Raw source

Mirrored ATT&CK source object

The raw object is retained through the mirrored ATT&CK source bundle and object hash. The raw endpoint returns the exact object from the mirrored bundle when available.

Source references

External references and citations

MITRE external references are preserved separately from Glexia analysis so citations remain traceable to their original source records.

  1. [1]
    mitre-attack AN1048
    Open source URL
Source and licensing

Source: MITRE ATT&CK®. © 2026 The MITRE Corporation. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE ATT&CK and ATT&CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. Glexia is not affiliated with or endorsed by MITRE.